What was the decision in New York Times Co v United States?

What was the decision in New York Times Co v United States?

The Court ruled 6-3 in New York Times v. United States that the prior restraint was unconstitutional. Though the majority justices disagreed on some important issues, they agreed that “Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government…

Which of these rights was limited by Schenck v United States?

freedom of speech protection

Which statement best describes the precedent set by the Supreme Court in New York Times vs US government censorship?

Answer Expert Verified. The statement that best describes the precedent set by the Supreme Court in New York Times v. United States regarding government censorship was that Government censorship is almost always unconstitutional.

How did the Tinker v Des Moines case impact society?

Tinker v. Des Moines is a historic Supreme Court ruling from 1969 that cemented students’ rights to free speech in public schools. The students returned after the Christmas break without armbands, but in protest, they wore black clothing for the remainder of the school year — and filed a First Amendment lawsuit.

What are the most important facts concerning the case of Tinker v Des Moines?

Key points. In 1965, a public school district in Iowa suspended three teenagers for wearing black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. Their families filed suit, and in 1969 the case reached the Supreme Court. The Court ruled that the school district had violated the students’ free speech rights.

What was the ruling in the Hazelwood case?

In a 5-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the principal’s actions did not violate the students’ free speech rights.

How does the Tinker decision affect your right to wear a T shirt supporting a cause that you believe in?

The Tinker decision is such an important First Amendment case because it violates the rights the students had to protest against the Vietnam War. The Tinker decision affects my right to wear a T-shirt supporting a cause I believe in by allowing me the right to wear that shirt.

How does Justice Black defend and explain his decision in the dissent for Tinker v Des Moines How strong is his reasoning What concerns do you have about his argument?

Justice Black argues that the majority decision will lead to schools being run by the students rather than the teachers. The majority opinion in Tinker v. Des Moines makes a clear, reasonable, and well-defended argument, making it stronger than the dissent in the decision.

Why is film censorship important?

Censoring certain parts of movies helps keep children away from hearing and seeing inappropriate things. When a film is shown on TV — and most movies are these days — children are exposed to it. Inappropriate scenes or a string of cuss words can teach them all the wrong things and have a bad influence.

Do we need film censorship?

Censorship and reasonable restrictions are required because of the impact that cinema can have on the minds of the viewing public. That is why films have to be certified in order for them to be exhibited in a public place according to age as Unrestricted, Adult or Under Parental Guidance or Special category.

Is censorship of movies an outdated concept?

There is no censorship to content on Television and Internet. Hence there is no point in censoring just movies. Censorship causes imposition of majoritarian ideals on others. It violates Freedom of speech and expression, which is guaranteed to Indians under Article 19(1) of Indian Constitution.

Do you agree that censorship negates the freedom of speech and expression?

The First Amendment protects American people from government censorship. But the First Amendment’s protections are not absolute, leading to Supreme Court cases involving the question of what is protected speech and what is not. When the government engages in censorship, First Amendment freedoms are implicated.


You already voted!

You may also like these